When my third daughter, Camille (now age 7), was 4 she started asking for violin lessons. I was very excited about her new desire, and especially because it seemed to come from "within." Her older two sisters play piano, and are basically forced to play because I am an amateur piano teacher and accompanist. The only problem with Camille's dream was that it would require MONEY. I had started the older two on the piano around age 5, and then moved them on to a private teacher in the 5th and 4th grades. The piano we already owned, so the first 5 or 6 years of lessons were free. My husband is very frugal, and usually I recognize this as a good thing. We rarely fight about money, have a shared checking account, complete transparency about investments, and are often able to reconcile our differences about how money should be spent. Camille's aspiration however, posed a major challenge to this previously copacetic money relationship.
I started investigating the costs of this endeavor when Camille started kindergarten. The going rate for 1/2 hour lessons in our area is $30-35, and a violin rental is about $30/month = $150/month or $1800/year. Our amazing piano teacher grossly undercharges for her lessons, so my husband argued that we could only afford violin lessons at the same discounted rate. But alas, there were no such teachers. I found myself begging and pleading him to relent and pay for the lessons and violin; that this was Camille's dream, that she was self-motivated, that you only have childhood to really learn music, etc....I would take every opportunity to lobby on behalf of Camille, until Jeff said we just couldn't afford it. Meanwhile, I shared our problem with a dear friend of mine who plays the violin, and she offered to get Camille started, but that she could only teach her for 6 months. Yeah! We started going to Lori's house weekly, and Camille was in heaven with her violin and her teacher. When school ended Lori gently urged me to find a professional teacher. Oh no! This meant back to the drawing board with Jeff! The begging and pleading began again, me often feeling like a petulant child or a groveling servant, and he (I assume) feeling trapped because he wanted the begging to stop, but feared taking on this new financial outlay. One night the solution came to me, why not have him pay the rate that we pay our piano teacher , and I'll make up the rest (more than half the cost) with the money I take in from teaching piano lessons? (This money has always been put in a fund for a new piano, called the "piano fund"). He was amenable to this idea, it meant that Camille would be getting her fair share of music lesson money, and that I would be taking on some of the financial responsibility.
This seemed like the perfect solution until the first payment to the new violin teacher was due. I had hoped that when it came time to write the check Jeff would gallantly step in and say, "Oh, don't worry about your portion. It'll take so much longer to save up for the new piano. We can afford it." But he didn't. My resentment grew until I exploded one night, and accused him of treating me like a child by not paying the full price himself. I slept on the couch that night. Out of desperation I called a sister, who firmly told me that if I reneged on our deal, then I really was a child, and worse, that I was treating Jeff like my daddy. Whoa....
Since this explosion I have learned a few things: 1) I am much more invested in how Camille does at her weekly lessons, and how the teacher teaches because it's my money being used, 2) by being financially responsible for this very small part of our family budget I feel a sense of satisfaction, and 3) by maintaining my end of this bargain I feel a little less indebted to Jeff and his paycheck.
However, many questions arise from this scenario that are still unanswered in my mind:
1) Are women who are dependent on their husband's salaries adults? In other words, if I have to make a case or beg for money for what I think is a valuable project, does that mean that I am a child and my husband is the daddy?
2) How should spouses settle money disputes when there is an imbalance in financial contributions?
3) Is it possible to get rid of the feeling of "asking" for money when you're not the one earning it? And if not, then go to question 1 - how do we define ourselves, or view ourselves when we're not the earners? If this adult/child disconnect persists, is being financially independent the only solution?
I would really love responses from all perspectives, people in my similar situation, as well as those of you who are contributors if not majority contributors in your household.
*
Meaning of "Pin Money" (http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/283200.html)
Originally a small allowance given to a woman in order to purchase clothes etc. for herself. More recently it is used to describe any small amount of money which might be earned by children or the low-paid for some service.
The earlier usage is quite old and is alluded to in the 16th century in The Testamenta Eboracensia - A Selection of Wills from the Registry at York, 1542:
"I give my said doughter Margarett my lease of the parsonadge of Kirkdall Churche.. to by her pynnes withal."
The first explicit mention of 'pin money' is in John Dryden's comedy Amphitryon, or the two Sosias, 1690:
"There's Pin-money, and Ali-money, and Seperate maintenance."
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I'll answer a question with a question. What if your roles were reversed? What if you were the breadwinner and he was the stay at home parent? Would you even consult him about the violin lessons? Are there things that he spends money on that he doesn't have to consult you on currently? I have mentioned the analogy of a business with you before, but if you saw the finances of your family as those of a small business, and the accounting department had to OK all expenditures, who would the accounting department be? Would the rest of the company have emotional issues about the accounting department? In some marriages one spouse or the other is "the responsible one" while the other is the one who likes to spend money, and it is not necessarily that the breadwinner is the one who acts more financially disciplined. I think that the important thing is that you come to a compromise that you are both OK with. Compromise meaning that neither of you will get 100% of what you want and that both of you are sacrificing something, but in the end you are both happy about it.
ReplyDeleteHow the role of money defines us as women.....well, I feel like when we decide as a couple that we want the mother to stay home with the kids instead of earning money, we kind of enter into a contract with each other. There is a certain amount of trust we put in each other. The stay at home parent trusting the other to continue to provide for needs and wants. And the working one trusting the other to raise the kids to a certain standard, and other expectations about housekeeping etc... By not working I feel that I have given up some of my independence. When I was working I had no problem with buying myself a new outfit when I felt like it, or other indulgences, but now I feel like I need to OK it with him first, not that he wants me to OK it with him, but that I feel guilty if I don't. It's not the same with the kids clothes, that seems more like a necessity because they keep growing, and I'm a thrifty shopper. Ido feel a certain amount of resentment when he questions how much I speant at Target for example, when all I was buying big ticket items like large packs of diapers and cat food, or socks and underwear for the kids, which adds up really quickly. It makes me feel like,"If you want me to do my job as being a good mom, then trust me that I am not throwing our money down the toilet but buying things in bulk because it is cheaper in the long run."
Back to your questions....
The only reason that I said you were acting like a child is because you didn't want to hold up your end of the bargain and you were disingenuous when you made the bargain. Your attitude about "asking for money" and "begging" is childish. I think the proper way for spouses to discuss money is as equal partners. You may have differences of opinions about how it should be spent, and that is when the work of compromising comes in. I think that it shows respect to your spouse when you OK a big purchase or financial obligation by him or her, but I don't think it should be seen as asking permission. Like two business partners who are equally invested in there company must maintain a certain transparency with each other. You wouldn't want one spouse spending money behind the other's back or sneaking around in any other way, that would damage the trust of the relationship. Both parties have to acknowledge that the only reason that one of them is not brining in money is because they have mutually agreed that the business of raising a family is best suited to the kids having a stay at home parent. If there were no kids, you would be working, and it would be a whole different story. The tricky part about rearing kids is that money can play a huge role in how they are raised, like with the violin lessons. In any marriage there are going to be differences in opinions and slightly different values about different aspects of child-rearing, I think the important thing is to talk about it and for both parties to be willing to give in on some things.
ReplyDeleteAre you treating yourself as an equal in the relationship?
Hey Rebecca! I'm so excited about your new blog. What a great way to use your talents and perspectives. I don't think that any woman who runs a family and household should even feel like there is "an imbalance in financial contribution" because her name isn't on the checks that come home. She should be confident in the work that she does to facilitate the bread-winning in addition to much more that contributes to the temporal/physical well-being of the household.
ReplyDeleteI feel like if both spouses truly feel like the money is "their" as opposed to "his" money then the wife shouldn't feel like she's taking a handout for household or personal expenses. If there's a dispute about how to spend the money, it should be resolved like any other disagreement.
Hello Jacey! So happy to see you here! Heather and Jacey, you both have excellent points, echoing the idea that the at-home spouse's work is valuable, and that it's important not to lose sight of that. I like your analogy of the small business, Heather, and how I can make myself a lesser partner by "begging." When Jeff read this post he was shocked (and hurt) that I used the "begging and groveling" language because this is rarely the case. This one anecdote however, brought it out in me after months and months of discussion. Maybe I did "let" myself be a child...Jacey, I like the idea that the at home parent is facilitating the bread-winner, and perhaps the biggest way is not the house or food, but the fact that the income earner is not preoccupied with raising the children. A challenge single parents HAVE to accept.
ReplyDeletehmm...I have to say we never fight about money and I always think about it as our money. I don't ask how much to spend or if I can spend. I am in charge of the money at our house actually. Christian is usually asking me if he can buy something! I don't care. We have a budget and we try to stay within the budget. When it comes to things for the girls I just buy what we need or sign up for lessons. I will tell christian I am going to do it but I don't think he has ever said a word about if we can afford it or if it is okay with him. I think part of this is because I am in charge of paying bills, etc so I am more "in tune" if you will with the money. As I write this I realize I might be Jeff's worst nightmare!
ReplyDelete